I have a lot of personal philosophies when it comes to shows. One of them came up yesterday. I was at
morgandawn's house and someone made a comment about the bad science in SGA.
My response was, "Really? SGA's better about their pseudoscience than most shows I've seenprovided Joe Flanigan isn't writing the episode. I mean their biology could use some work, but really their physics is...oh. You were talking about the anthropology. See, when you call it a science, I get all confused."
I am so Rodney McKay deep in my soul.
But that's the subject for another post.
Here's my personal philosophy. Bad science only hurts me if I let it. I don't let it. Because otherwise it would hurt me all the time and I'd stop being a sci-fi fan altogether. I've learned to call magic when I see it. I've learned to understand my show's writers.
Honestly I see pretty much all the anthropology in SGA as a giant shoutout to classic Trek. The Genii are a perfect example. Here's an alien race that's 60 years behind us technologically. And it's eeeeevil! Let's make their uniforms look just like the Germans' in WWII! I mean really, the entire show is a giant shoutout. Hey, it's like they took the title Star Trek and replaced "Trek" with "Gate" -- GET IT?!? GET IT?!?
::cough::
Take the large, chunky holes in BSG's anthropology. Interstellar space travel. Field medicine and surgical techniques circa 2006. Gene sequencing machine engineered by Gaius Baltar, Jack of all sciences, master of...all, apparently. Field medicine and surgical techniques circa 2006. I mean, that would make sense in, say, SGA if there were a planet working really hard on weapons technology but not bothering to develop their medecine because hey! Everyone dies by wraith! Trying to put equal focus on medicine would be a waste of resources. But BSG has no such circumstances. There's no good reason why they would be so advanced in one field and so stunted in another.
Unless magic is at work.
Or better yet, fate. A path of societal development foretold by the gods, SO SAY WE ALL.
See? Now I feel better. God works in mysterious ways. Magic explains all. I keep my sanity. I'm not getting mad at a show for failing to be meticulous about something that is clearly not one of the writers' priorities.
At the beginning of SGA the creators tried to get military approval for their show. The military told them they'd need to get rid of John Sheppard's hair. The creators decided John's hair was more important.
And thank goodness for that.
The next time someone holds a gun wrong or salutes wrong or whatever, I'm just going to picture John in a crew cut and count my blessings.
My response was, "Really? SGA's better about their pseudoscience than most shows I've seen
I am so Rodney McKay deep in my soul.
But that's the subject for another post.
Here's my personal philosophy. Bad science only hurts me if I let it. I don't let it. Because otherwise it would hurt me all the time and I'd stop being a sci-fi fan altogether. I've learned to call magic when I see it. I've learned to understand my show's writers.
Honestly I see pretty much all the anthropology in SGA as a giant shoutout to classic Trek. The Genii are a perfect example. Here's an alien race that's 60 years behind us technologically. And it's eeeeevil! Let's make their uniforms look just like the Germans' in WWII! I mean really, the entire show is a giant shoutout. Hey, it's like they took the title Star Trek and replaced "Trek" with "Gate" -- GET IT?!? GET IT?!?
::cough::
Take the large, chunky holes in BSG's anthropology. Interstellar space travel. Field medicine and surgical techniques circa 2006. Gene sequencing machine engineered by Gaius Baltar, Jack of all sciences, master of...all, apparently. Field medicine and surgical techniques circa 2006. I mean, that would make sense in, say, SGA if there were a planet working really hard on weapons technology but not bothering to develop their medecine because hey! Everyone dies by wraith! Trying to put equal focus on medicine would be a waste of resources. But BSG has no such circumstances. There's no good reason why they would be so advanced in one field and so stunted in another.
Unless magic is at work.
Or better yet, fate. A path of societal development foretold by the gods, SO SAY WE ALL.
See? Now I feel better. God works in mysterious ways. Magic explains all. I keep my sanity. I'm not getting mad at a show for failing to be meticulous about something that is clearly not one of the writers' priorities.
At the beginning of SGA the creators tried to get military approval for their show. The military told them they'd need to get rid of John Sheppard's hair. The creators decided John's hair was more important.
And thank goodness for that.
The next time someone holds a gun wrong or salutes wrong or whatever, I'm just going to picture John in a crew cut and count my blessings.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 02:15 am (UTC)SGA just wouldn't be the same without JF's emotional hair.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 02:19 am (UTC)Truer words have ne'er been spoken.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 02:24 am (UTC)I think the military just likes to look extra spiffy on tv.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 02:55 am (UTC)Word on BSG. It huurrtss precious, when the perfectly logical development of a society is ignored, or worse, never addressed. Especially if there's a glaring hole the size of China smack dab in the middle of it staring at you like the biggest, pinkest elephant ever thought into existence. "It's war! We're fighting evil aliens! We don't have time to advance medicine, even though there are only like, three of us left and we're the last of our race! D'oh!"
I know scientists freak out over the bad physics/chemistry on their favorite show, but as an anthropologist, I freak out over this kind of stuff.
Thank God I suspended my disbelief and left it in the restaurant at the end of the universe.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 03:05 am (UTC)And thank goodness for that.
The next time someone holds a gun wrong or salutes wrong or whatever, I'm just going to picture John in a crew cut and count my blessings.
*grins*
So say we all.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 03:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 05:01 am (UTC)Did that make sense? Probably not. The point is, I totally agree with you. The show is fun! Who cares if it's not exactly correct in every detail, or any detail? Pretty people shooting guns, weirdly sexy aliens, Teyla's midriff - all incentives not to nitpick. *g*
(In contrast, I only made it about fifteen minute into First Monday. I had to stop when the US Supreme Court clerk was making an anti-death penalty argument by saying "This guy was struck by lightening and didn't die. If God can't kill him, what gives us the right?" And I laughed and laughed, closed VLC, and deleted the show from my harddrive forever. No suspension of anything for that lame bit of writing.)
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 08:23 am (UTC)Which, really, tells you just about everything you need to know about the show before you even start *g*.
I tend to think of SGA's science as actually being pretty good. But that's because I pay some attention to the physics and computer science, and put my fingers in my ears and go lalalalalalala whenever they mention biology or medicine. Otherwise my brain will melt. Apart from in Allies, the computer stuff has been fairly believable.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 01:58 pm (UTC)Have you seen the Richard Dean Anderson episode of the Simpsons? "Of the four Star franchises: Wars, Trek, Gate, and Search; Stargate is by far my third favorite."
At the beginning of SGA the creators tried to get military approval for their show. The military told them they'd need to get rid of John Sheppard's hair. The creators decided John's hair was more important.
So the Air Force's fondness of SG-1 doesn't transfer over? That's disappointing. I guess the Air Force Chief of Staff won't be guest starring as himself again.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 02:17 pm (UTC)Uh-huh.
Oh, God, yes. I love the characters and the premise so much, compelling and cool and flawed, but JESUS, the science and world-building makes me weep on occasion.
So glad they had their priorities straight.
Or maybe not quite so straight, of course.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 02:57 am (UTC)::nostalgic sigh::
no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 04:39 am (UTC)There is a difference between the pseudoscience that is rougly based on modernday scientific knowledge and the pseudoscience that just uses catchphrases to mean whatever the hell the writers want it to mean.
The ZPM works as a fictional concept.
Theoretically (according to string theory) if you could somehow bottle subspace time and draw energy from it, the amount of energy would be huge. That part makes sense. The actual bottling of it is explained away as superior technology from an advanced race, which also makes sense.
On the other hand, saying one of the properties of a wormhole is that it only lets things through in discrete units -- that was completely pulled out of somebody's ass.
In the former example the writers are inventing technology that finds a loophole in a law of physics. In the latter, the writers are inventing a law of physics.
Or rather, it's the difference between saying, "Hey, what if we built a machine that could fly using the same principles by which birds fly!" and saying, "Hey, what if we built a machine made out of an imaginary material that was mysteriously immune to gravity!"
::reads over comment::
Oh my God, I'm such a h0r.
::posts it anyway::
no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 04:43 am (UTC)And yeah. Their biology really is voodoo. But, well, so is everyone else's.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 04:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 04:52 am (UTC):P
no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 12:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 04:26 pm (UTC)Yay! Good to know I'm not the only one who overthinks things.
I got The Elegant Universe back in eleventh grade when my physics teacher recommended it. Never got more than halfway through, but it's still sitting on my bookshelf, right next to my copy of Alice in Wonderland.
I remember talking to
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 04:19 am (UTC)dude, it's Beckett, of COURSE he did. o.o
no subject
Date: 2006-07-21 12:42 pm (UTC)XD