lierdumoa: (Default)
[personal profile] lierdumoa
So I just got about one page into this New Yorker Review of The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel before getting too pissed off to continue.

Like, okay, I don't expect everybody to like the show. It's fluffy.

But it seems like the main thrust of Emily Nussbalm's scathing critique is that the female protagonist is too much of a Mary-Sue, which ... really?

She describes the show as a "cloying fantasia" which is a really fancy way of saying that the protagonist is too unrealistic -- why? Well, because she's good at more than one thing, success in her chosen career comes fairly easily to her, and also she's pretty.

The show's protagonist has the same base personality type, talent level, and attributes as, oh let's say ~80% of the male leads in all genres of television throughout television history. And yet a female writer penned this critique, seemingly without any self-awareness as to the double standards the critique is perpetuating.

The author of the article also thinks the show could be edgier. How, you ask? She thinks the butch manager should be pining after the straight protagonist. The non-gender-conforming butch isn't sad or pathetic enough.

I threw up a little in my mouth and then I didn't bother reading the rest.

Just.

I'm so tired.

Let women have power fantasies.

Date: 2018-12-19 05:02 am (UTC)
monanotlisa: symbol, image, ttrpg, party, pun about rolling dice and getting rolling (Default)
From: [personal profile] monanotlisa
Urgh. Like you say. What the fuck?

Date: 2018-12-19 08:40 am (UTC)
calystarose: Callisto from Xena & a rose (Default)
From: [personal profile] calystarose
eek! that sounds like a very bad review indeed

Profile

lierdumoa: (Default)
lierdumoa

February 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728 29  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 23rd, 2025 08:32 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios