On clipping and rhythm in vidding
Aug. 3rd, 2004 01:01 pmYesterday I was supposed to be writing RPS. But I got lazy. So instead I decided to read lots and lots of vid meta. I came across
laurashapiro's notes on her Creating Mood Panel.
permetaform last night. The both of us are total beat nazis (or maybe beat whores is a better term). Our chat helped me to develop my argument against this set of vidding guidelines.
I'll start with a little background on me. I played piano all through childhood. I'm very conscious of rhythm and meter in music. If a song has a really interesting, really complex beat, it's the first thing I notice. If a song doesn't have drums, I will pick beats out of the melody. I did not learn to clip on beat. No one had to tell me to clip on beat. It was always completely automatic for me. The only vid I didn't clip on beat for is my very first one, and I cringe every time I look at it (although I think all vidders do that with their first vids).
Now my first objection -- danceable? Bouncy? The song itself is always on beat. That does not necessairily mean the song is danceable or bouncy. I don't see how clipping to the beat would make a vid danceable or bouncy. I vidded to Tori Amos's cover of Nirvana's "Smells Like Teen Spirit." The music itself has no drums -- only vocals and piano. The beat is more often understood than heard explicitly. All of my clipping for that vid is on beat. Certainly it wasn't the best vid in the world, but at no point did my vid come across as bouncy or danceable. I managed to maintain proper mood throughout and stay on beat.
Also, I noticed that even when beat did not coincide exactly with lyric, it was close enough that it felt like I was clipping on the lyric. My clips were positioned to accent the beat, but due to their context it seemed as if they were emphasizing the lyrics more than the beat. Clipping to the beat doesn't have to undermine your meaning as long as you don't do it badly. If a song is slow, you might want to make a scene last through two or three beats instead of one, because otherwise your visuals will be moving faster than your music. Of course, if your visuals move too fast for your music, your vid might come across as bouncy when it shouldn't. The problem isn't that you're on beat.
My second objection -- that by clipping to the lyric "vid...may have more flow, or feel more organic." I don't care what the music is -- it will never have more flow or feel more organic to me if a song is clipped offbeat. It will always feel slightly wrong. That's just how I, personally, experience music. I have to force myself not to notice when vids aren't clipped on beat. I don't know why it bothers me so much and not others. I strongly suspect it has something to do with the fact that the majority of fandom is made up of rhythmless white nerds (don't deny it).
My third objection to this set of guidelines is that I don't think it encourages a proper understanding of what beat is. Beats and lyrics are not mutually exclusive. A song beat is very complex. It has lots of intermediate beats. Grace notes and musical accents are not outside of the beat, but inside of it. Part of it. Lyrics themselves have beats. English is a language with a stress accent. Words have rhythm to them. I noticed this especially when I vidded rap. The words have a beat as much as the background music. A few of my clips in my Superman vid were matched up to lyrical beats -- to various stressed syllables. This was most noticeable, I think, at point 1:52 in the vid with the words "runway ho," and point 2:11 with the words "everybody knows."
ETA: If you're reading this and you haven't seen my vid, but want to, you can download it here.
On a somewhat related note, I think it would be interesting for someone to try to vid Tori Amos with lyrical beats in mind. I've seen a number of vids to her, and made a vid to her, but I don't think any of them quite do her justice. She has some of the most complex lyrical beats I've ever heard, in which she uses both pitch and stress to accent certain syllables.
In her song "Siren" off the Great Expectations soundtrack she pronounces the word "vanilla" as "vi-ni-ia-la-a." The word sounds like it has extra syllables because of the way she stretches a singular vowel sound across several different pitch ranges. In "Take To The Sky" she sings the lyrics "hold me in the dark" as to "ho-old me in the da-ark." She stresses syllables that don't necessarily exist in the webster's dictionary pronunciation guide. I think one extreme example is in "A Sorta Fairytale" when she sings "for me to take your word I had to steal it" as "for me to ta-ake you word I had to ste-e-e-eal it." The word "steal" goes through four different pitch changes. Pure. Aural. Sex.
She's the one of the few artists I've seen do this consistently. I've also noticed it in Boa's "Duvet" and the Cranberries' "Zombie" and, to a lesser extent, some of Jewel's and Alanis Morissette's music. Personally, I think it sounds more interesting the way Tori does it. Less yodel-y.
I don't know *how* anyone could represent this in a vid, but I'd love it if someone tried. I'm going to be vidding "Spring Haze" to Butterfly Effect (the theater version), so I guess I could try my hand at it. The song has both complex drum beats and complex lyrical beats.
Timing CutsNow my gut instinct after reading this was to think -- you're wrong. You should always cut on beat. But here was someone disagreeing with me. So I had to think about why my opinion on this point was so strong. I had a conversation with
To the Beat - simple, direct, "punchy", makes the vid danceable, hard-hitting, rhythmically satisfying
To the Lyric - emphasizes the words, cuts will sometimes be on the beat and sometimes not, vid has less bounciness but may have more flow, or feel more organic
Other - cutting to a grace note or other musical accent will tend to emphasize that element in the music, so the mood of that guitar solo or drum break more concretely affects the mood of your vid in that moment
I'll start with a little background on me. I played piano all through childhood. I'm very conscious of rhythm and meter in music. If a song has a really interesting, really complex beat, it's the first thing I notice. If a song doesn't have drums, I will pick beats out of the melody. I did not learn to clip on beat. No one had to tell me to clip on beat. It was always completely automatic for me. The only vid I didn't clip on beat for is my very first one, and I cringe every time I look at it (although I think all vidders do that with their first vids).
Now my first objection -- danceable? Bouncy? The song itself is always on beat. That does not necessairily mean the song is danceable or bouncy. I don't see how clipping to the beat would make a vid danceable or bouncy. I vidded to Tori Amos's cover of Nirvana's "Smells Like Teen Spirit." The music itself has no drums -- only vocals and piano. The beat is more often understood than heard explicitly. All of my clipping for that vid is on beat. Certainly it wasn't the best vid in the world, but at no point did my vid come across as bouncy or danceable. I managed to maintain proper mood throughout and stay on beat.
Also, I noticed that even when beat did not coincide exactly with lyric, it was close enough that it felt like I was clipping on the lyric. My clips were positioned to accent the beat, but due to their context it seemed as if they were emphasizing the lyrics more than the beat. Clipping to the beat doesn't have to undermine your meaning as long as you don't do it badly. If a song is slow, you might want to make a scene last through two or three beats instead of one, because otherwise your visuals will be moving faster than your music. Of course, if your visuals move too fast for your music, your vid might come across as bouncy when it shouldn't. The problem isn't that you're on beat.
My second objection -- that by clipping to the lyric "vid...may have more flow, or feel more organic." I don't care what the music is -- it will never have more flow or feel more organic to me if a song is clipped offbeat. It will always feel slightly wrong. That's just how I, personally, experience music. I have to force myself not to notice when vids aren't clipped on beat. I don't know why it bothers me so much and not others. I strongly suspect it has something to do with the fact that the majority of fandom is made up of rhythmless white nerds (don't deny it).
My third objection to this set of guidelines is that I don't think it encourages a proper understanding of what beat is. Beats and lyrics are not mutually exclusive. A song beat is very complex. It has lots of intermediate beats. Grace notes and musical accents are not outside of the beat, but inside of it. Part of it. Lyrics themselves have beats. English is a language with a stress accent. Words have rhythm to them. I noticed this especially when I vidded rap. The words have a beat as much as the background music. A few of my clips in my Superman vid were matched up to lyrical beats -- to various stressed syllables. This was most noticeable, I think, at point 1:52 in the vid with the words "runway ho," and point 2:11 with the words "everybody knows."
ETA: If you're reading this and you haven't seen my vid, but want to, you can download it here.
On a somewhat related note, I think it would be interesting for someone to try to vid Tori Amos with lyrical beats in mind. I've seen a number of vids to her, and made a vid to her, but I don't think any of them quite do her justice. She has some of the most complex lyrical beats I've ever heard, in which she uses both pitch and stress to accent certain syllables.
In her song "Siren" off the Great Expectations soundtrack she pronounces the word "vanilla" as "vi-ni-ia-la-a." The word sounds like it has extra syllables because of the way she stretches a singular vowel sound across several different pitch ranges. In "Take To The Sky" she sings the lyrics "hold me in the dark" as to "ho-old me in the da-ark." She stresses syllables that don't necessarily exist in the webster's dictionary pronunciation guide. I think one extreme example is in "A Sorta Fairytale" when she sings "for me to take your word I had to steal it" as "for me to ta-ake you word I had to ste-e-e-eal it." The word "steal" goes through four different pitch changes. Pure. Aural. Sex.
She's the one of the few artists I've seen do this consistently. I've also noticed it in Boa's "Duvet" and the Cranberries' "Zombie" and, to a lesser extent, some of Jewel's and Alanis Morissette's music. Personally, I think it sounds more interesting the way Tori does it. Less yodel-y.
I don't know *how* anyone could represent this in a vid, but I'd love it if someone tried. I'm going to be vidding "Spring Haze" to Butterfly Effect (the theater version), so I guess I could try my hand at it. The song has both complex drum beats and complex lyrical beats.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-19 12:30 pm (UTC)This is going to sound perhaps very strange and I don't mean this as an insult at all, because I do think that you hit the nail on the head when you said that we hear music differently, and thus what I want from a vid is probably quite different, but the vids that seemed to get a lot of praise at Vividcon were things that felt too polished to me, not organic at all, too souless in a way.
I was reading the con reports and just viewing the ones that many people were praising as being great and, er, I found most of them rather boring in a way. What I found is that I enjoyed it the first viewing, but repeat viewings didn't seem to offer me anything new to look at, and so I grew bored very rapidly.
I will give an example of a vid that many folks think is just amazing but I've always found really boring, and that is Sisabet's SV vid--the one she did to Placebo. I remember watching it when everyone was having orgasms over it when it was first released and finding it so dull that I didn't watch the whole thing. It was too...polished. Too professional. It didn't do anything that made me feel the music at all.
I still find that very strange to this day. I mean, obviously, this is something about me and what I want from vids.
Actually, you know what it reminds me of? I remember in college going to see a dance troupe and the piece that they danced to was Peter Gabriel's Passion. I remember thinking, "Oh, dear. If I were the choreographer, I would never have done it this way." It was very focused on the beat, and that isn't how I always heard the album. I always heard the album with my focus going from instrument to instrument. In my head, I imagined how I'd have choreographed it, and no doubt dancers and choreographers alike would have shuddered and died, but I thought there should be a dancer representing each instrument, and that the dance should blend these dancers just as the song blended the instruments.
In my mind it was beautiful. ;)
But, I have to say that I really, really, really don't think that vidding is my passion. What am I saying? I know vidding is not my passion. So, I think that I might not think like vidders think. I went to lunch with
I've read some meta posts on vidding and my main reaction is befuzzlement about why anyone feels that strongly about vidding. I don't feel that kind of passion for it. I think it is because vids don't hold up for me over time--although, oddly, even though I know they aren't very good vids, my vids do hold up for me over time. Well, most of them. There are a few that I never liked that much to begin with that I still don't like a lot. *laughs*
Ummm, so, I think all of that was to say that I find most fangirled vids to be un-organic feeling, too polished, and boring--especially on repeat viewings.
You know, the only vids by other people I keep on my hard drive are:
Head Over Feet by whoever did that one. Ladies and Gentlemen, We Are Floating In Space, by whoever did that one. Cigarettes and Chocolate Milk, by whoever did that one. And I'm considering keeping Defying Gravity despite some of the parts that feel too technical for my enjoyment. And your Smells Like Teen Spirit vid. All of those are decidedly less polished than the vids that get high critical acclaim in fandom.
I think I just like organic over polished, and too much beat often feels too polished to me. I have no fucking clue if any of this makes sense. ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-08-19 03:01 pm (UTC)On the other hand, sometimes I want it to look forced, depending on how forceful I feel the beat is. A lot of VAST songs, for example have beats that are incredibly complex, and almost entirely made up of different drums. If anyone were to vid one of their songs without serious attention to the complexity of the beat, I would feel as if they were ignoring the most important part of the song.
I found it interesting what you said about the dancers not representing the instruments. If I were watching that choreography, I'd probably want the dancers to represent the instruments with a style of dance. The thing is, dancing to the instruments wouldn't make the dancers off-beat. The instruments are not against the beat -- they work with it (unless it's some new kind of music that I've never heard of). When I represent musical accents in my vids, I always represent them in addition to representing the main beat. I think they are important for the sounds they make, but equally important for the way they fit into flow of the song.
I think this had a lot to do with my piano training. I've composed a few pieces for the piano. When you write music, the beat is the groundwork. This is how it is with every song. All lyrical accents and musical notations are built on the beat. In any piece of sheetmusic the first thing you see before you see any notes is the meter -- the number of beats pure musical stanza. Music is an artform based heavily in repeated patterns -- repeated choruses, repeated verse structure, and underneath that a constant beat that spans the whole song.
So in that way, vids that don't hit the beat don't feel more organic to me because the beat itself is what is most organic to me. When I see something that's offbeat, it actually feels unnatural to me because for me the beat is the most natural, most fundamental part of the music.
I find your reaction to Sisabet's SV vid interesting. It was very polished, but what personally appealed to me about it was the story. It said a lot of interesting things about Lex's emotional journey. I liked the effects and the faithfulness to the beat as an added bonus to the story.
"Cigarettes and Chocolate Milk" is one of my favorite QaF vids because of, again, the story it tells. It bugs me slightly that the clip placement is always really close to the beat but not quite there. It makes up for it in that the clips move well with the song. Even when they are slightly off beat they still keep up the right pace and go just the right speed for the music, which gives the sense that if you were to average together all the slightly off timings, they'd all be on beat.
I've read some meta posts on vidding and my main reaction is befuzzlement about why anyone feels that strongly about vidding.
I think that's how it is with any obsession that isn't yours. I don't understand how people can be so into baseball -- I think it's the most boring sport ever invented. In fact, most sports have no appeal to me -- they just aren't my obsession.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-19 05:23 pm (UTC)I think that my favorite vid of my own has always been my second one, Because I Told You So, but that's just 'cause I like the opening so well.
Hmm, I should sit down and watch all of my vids from beginning (Hey Jupiter) to end and cringe in horror. ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-08-19 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-19 06:00 pm (UTC)Hey, you wouldn't have the time to beta, would you?
no subject
Date: 2004-08-19 06:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-19 06:02 pm (UTC)Okay, is lierdumoa at live journal the way to send it?
no subject
Date: 2004-08-19 06:03 pm (UTC)